Company profile · HARTING Technologiegruppe · 2014–2024

HARTING patents connectors, and its portfolio has narrowed further onto them.

704 patent families and 2,334 applications at 16 offices. 76.0% carry the connector subclass H01R. The scope needs 65 name variants, including the Chinese and Japanese office-side renderings.

Data
EPO PATSTAT Global, Spring 2026 (patstat_2026a)
Unit
DOCDB family, by earliest patent-of-invention filing
Scope
65 HARTING name variants · patents of invention
Queries
10, all published
Applications by filing office · rows from front to back: cohorts 2014–2017 (252 families), 2018–2021 (223 families)Query 6
  1. 76.0%

    of the 704 families carry a connector code in H01R; the next subclass has 51.

    Technology
  2. 84.3%

    of the 2018–2021 cohort is in H01R, up from 69.8% in 2014–2017.

    Connectors
  3. 61.4%

    of the families (432) have a PCT member.

    Filing trend
  4. 40

    han_name groups split the company; summed naively they give 1,239 family entries where there are 704 families.

    Scope
  5. 1

    external partner in eleven years: MIT, on two applications of one family.

    Partners

01 · Scope

704 families sit behind 65 name variants and 40 han_name groups

PATSTAT performs no entity resolution: a company exists only as a set of spellings, one person_id per rendering, country and typo. A substring search on person_name across a wide discovery window returned 182 candidate name rows; 65 survive review inside the report window. han_name was checked in both directions. Contamination: none, every person_name sharing a han_name group with the scope is a HARTING entity. Fragmentation: severe, the group scatters across 40 han_name groups. Summed naively, the 40 groups give 1,239 family entries and the 65 variants 1,422; deduplicated, the portfolio is 704 families.

Families per han_name group

Data table: han_name groups
han_name fragmentation (families with an application filed 2014–2024)
han_name groupFamilies
HARTING ELECT GMBH & CO KG267
HARTING ELECT STIFTUNG & CO KG218
HARTING (ZHUHAI) MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.153
HARTING ELECTS GMBH111
HARTING SYSTEMS GMBH63
HARTING ELECTRIC FOUNDATION GMBH & CO. KG63
HARTING INT INNOVATION AG59
HARTING ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG36
HARTING AUTOMOTIVE GMBH35
HARTING AG&CO KG28
HARTING KGAA28
HARTING CUSTOMISED SOLUTIONS GMBH & CO KG22
28 further groups (combined)156
Total across 40 groups (naive sum)1,239

Query 2Counts families with an application filed 2014–2024; the 704 count families whose earliest filing falls in that window. Not interchangeable.

What was kept, what was dropped

GroupDecisionEvidence
Latin corporate variants (HARTING Electric, Electronics, Systems, Automotive, Customised Solutions, International Innovation, IT Software, Applied Technologies, Deutschland, Zhuhai, AG & Co. KG, KGaA, Stiftung, Corporation)KeptName begins with HARTING and denotes a legal entity
Russian transliterations (KHARTING ELEKTRIK GMBKH UND KO. KG, KHARTING EHLEKTRIK…, KHARTING ELEKTRONIKS GMBKH, KHARTING APPLAJD TEKNOLODZHIZ GMBKH)KeptCyrillic-to-Latin re-transliteration of the same entities; all filed at RU
Chinese renderings (浩亭…, 哈廷…) and Japanese renderings (ハルティング…)KeptConfirmed by DOCDB family overlap with the Latin variants, then verified independently
Machine transliterations (HARYNTE ELECTRONIC LIMITED COMPANY AND TWO-IN-ONE COMPANY, HARBIN ELECTRONIC FOUNDATION TWO-IN-ONE COMPANY)KeptWord-by-word renderings of the Chinese names; same families
HARTIN Electric Stiftung & Co. KGKeptTypo variant found only via family overlap; a %HARTING% search cannot reach it
HARTING CORPORATION (no country code)Kept4 of its 5 families are shared with HARTING International Innovation and the holding
Chilean individuals (Harting Glade, Harting Eckman, Harting S.A.) and their Chinese renderings 托马斯·弗朗西斯·哈廷格莱德 / 史蒂文·李·哈廷埃克曼ExcludedNatural persons and an unrelated Chilean company; no family overlap with the group
HARTINGER, HARTINGH, HARTINGTON, HARTINGS, STANDHARTINGER, VAN HARTINGSVELDT, Karl Hartinger Kranbetrieb, VOLUME CHARTING METHOD COMPANYExcludedDifferent names that merely contain the search string

Query 1182 candidate rows reviewed; substring search, wider than a prefix search

HARTING files at CNIPA and the JPO under names in the local script. No Latin search returns them, and the failure is silent. They were found through the other members of HARTING's own families, then verified by searching each string directly, without any family restriction. Up to seven families are reachable only through these renderings: six under 哈廷电子有限公司及两合公司 and one under its machine transliteration, which may be the same family, so six is the floor and seven the ceiling.

Office-side renderings and the families no Latin spelling reaches

Office-side renderingOfficeFamiliesNot reachable by any Latin spelling
哈廷电子有限公司及两合公司CN1236
浩亭电子有限公司CN390
哈廷电子基金会两合公司CN210
ハルティング エレクトリック …JP190
ハルティング エレクトロニクス …JP130
浩亭汽车部件有限公司CN50
HARYNTE ELECTRONIC LIMITED COMPANY AND TWO-IN-ONE COMPANYCN41
浩亭股份有限公司CN30
ハルティング オートモーティヴ …JP30
浩亭(珠海)制造有限公司CN20
浩亭信息技术软件开发有限及两合公司CN20
HARBIN ELECTRONIC FOUNDATION TWO-IN-ONE COMPANYCN20
ハルティング アクチエンゲゼルシャフト …JP10
浩亭国际创新股份公司CN10

Query 48 Chinese, 4 Japanese and 2 machine-transliterated renderings, found by family overlap (Query 3)

02 · Filing trend

Output is steady; the higher counts after 2021 cannot yet be read

2014–2017

252 families, between 49 and 77 a year. 432 of all 704 families (61.4%) have a WO member: the PCT is the default route.

2018–2021

223 families: an output in a band of roughly 50 to 77 a year with no sustained direction.

2022–2024

Family counts reach 76 (2023) and 91 (2024), while applications per family drop from a 2014–2021 range of 3.4 to 4.7 to 2.94, 2.04 and 1.66. PCT and national-phase members appear one to three years after the first member and are not yet in the data.

Read with care

The PCT rate reads 37.4% for 2024 against a 2014–2021 range of 54.5% to 78.0%: a publication effect, not a change of route. No growth rate ends in these years.

Patent families by earliest filing year

Data table: filing trend 2014–2024
Families, applications and PCT rate by earliest filing year (* incomplete)
YearPatent familiesApplicationsApplications per familyFamilies with a WO memberPCT rate
2014492144.373367.3%
2015742713.665574.3%
2016521973.793363.5%
2017772653.444254.5%
2018542013.723055.6%
2019501953.903366.0%
2020502374.743978.0%
2021692663.865275.4%
2022*621822.944064.5%
2023*761552.044153.9%
2024*911511.663437.4%
Total7042,3343.3243261.4%

Query 5Hatched: incomplete years. 2,334 applications, 3.32 per family.

03 · Offices

Germany's share of applications fell as China's rose

538 of 704 families (76.4%) have a DE filing, and the PCT is the second step for 431 of them. The pattern is a German priority filing, a PCT application and a broad national phase. Between the 2014–2017 and 2018–2021 cohorts China's share of applications rises from 14.7% to 18.7%, the EPO's from 14.7% to 18.2% and the US share from 13.6% to 16.5%, while Germany's falls from 23.9% to 20.4%. Russia goes from 34 applications to 3, Canada and Japan from 18 each to none. The German count falls too (226 to 183): the same home base, with filings pushed further out.

Families filing at each office, 2014–2024

Data table: filing offices
Filing offices 2014–2024
OfficeFamiliesShare of 704 familiesApplications
DE — Germany (DPMA)53876.4%538
WO — PCT (WIPO)43161.2%433
EP — European Patent Office37453.1%389
CN — China (CNIPA)36551.8%376
US — United States (USPTO)30843.8%317
KR — Korea (KIPO)13519.2%136
RU — Russia375.3%37
GB — United Kingdom355.0%35
PL — Poland233.3%23
CA — Canada192.7%19
JP — Japan (JPO)182.6%18
CH — Switzerland60.9%6
DK — Denmark20.3%2
ES — Spain20.3%2
MX — Mexico20.3%2
BR — Brazil10.1%1
Total (applications)——2,334

Query 5Family counts per office sum above 704; the application column sums to the total

Share of the cohort's applications filed at each office (%)

Data table: geographic shift between cohorts
Applications by office and cohort
OfficeApplications 2014–2017ShareApplications 2018–2021Share
DE22623.9%18320.4%
WO16417.3%15417.1%
CN13914.7%16818.7%
EP13914.7%16418.2%
US12913.6%14816.5%
KR626.5%647.1%
RU343.6%30.3%
CA181.9%00.0%
JP181.9%00.0%
PL141.5%91.0%
Other (DK, ES, CH, BR)40.4%60.7%
Total947100.0%899100.0%

Query 6Cohorts of 252 and 223 families by earliest filing year

Both cohorts end before the incomplete years. A boundary at 2023 would put missing national-phase entries inside the later period and show the same data as a broad geographic retreat: a lag artefact, not a company decision.

04 · Technology

Three quarters of the families carry the connector subclass H01R

535 of 704 families (76.0%) carry a code in H01R, electrically conductive connections and coupling devices; the next subclass, H05K, reaches 51. In the WIPO view 562 families (79.8%) fall in the single field Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy. Outside the core sit cable installation (H02G), electric vehicle supply (B60L), printed circuits (H05K), shop fittings and coin-freed apparatus (A47F, G07F) and electrolytic coating (C25D). For a connector maker these read as adjacent fields; the classification alone cannot establish that.

Families by IPC subclass (non-exclusive)

Data table: IPC subclasses
Top 15 IPC subclasses
IPC subclassTitleFamiliesShare of 704
H01RElectrically-conductive connections; structural associations of mutually-insulated electrical connecting elements; coupling devices; current collectors53576.0%
H05KPrinted circuits; casings or constructional details of electric apparatus517.2%
H02GInstallation of electric cables or lines, or of combined optical and electric cables or lines355.0%
B60LPropulsion of electrically-propelled vehicles; supplying electric power for auxiliary equipment334.7%
G06FElectric digital data processing284.0%
G01RMeasuring electric variables; measuring magnetic variables233.3%
A47FSpecial furniture, fittings or accessories for shops, storehouses, bars, restaurants; paying counters223.1%
G07FCoin-freed or like apparatus202.8%
H01BCables; conductors; insulators; selection of materials for conductive, insulating or dielectric properties182.6%
H04LTransmission of digital information172.4%
G02BOptical elements, systems or apparatus162.3%
F16BDevices for fastening or securing constructional elements or machine parts together152.1%
C25DProcesses for the electrolytic or electrophoretic production of coatings; electroforming152.1%
G06QICT specially adapted for administrative, commercial, financial or managerial purposes152.1%
B61GCouplings specially adapted for railway vehicles; draught or buffing appliances121.7%

Query 6692 of 704 families carry an IPC code. The fifteen subclasses account for 855 family-subclass pairs.

Families by WIPO technology field (non-exclusive)

Data table: WIPO fields
WIPO technology fields with 10 or more families
Technology fieldWIPO sectorFamiliesShare of 704
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energyElectrical engineering56279.8%
Audio-visual technologyElectrical engineering618.7%
TransportMechanical engineering568.0%
MeasurementInstruments446.3%
Computer technologyElectrical engineering385.4%
ControlInstruments375.3%
Mechanical elementsMechanical engineering243.4%
Furniture, gamesOther fields223.1%
TelecommunicationsElectrical engineering202.8%
Surface technology, coatingChemistry182.6%
OpticsInstruments172.4%
Digital communicationElectrical engineering172.4%
IT methods for managementElectrical engineering152.1%
HandlingMechanical engineering121.7%
Other special machinesMechanical engineering121.7%
Machine toolsMechanical engineering101.4%

Query 7Fields below 10 families omitted

Run through CPC instead of IPC, the same families give 526 in H01R against 535. Both schemes reach 692 of 704 families, so neither is blind here. CPC adds the Y tagging codes, which have no IPC equivalent.

CPC Y tagging codes in the portfolio

CPC tagging codeMeaningFamilies
Y02TClimate change mitigation technologies related to transportation24
Y02EReduction of greenhouse gas emissions related to energy generation, transmission or distribution8
Y10TTechnical subjects covered by former US classification4
Y02PClimate change mitigation technologies in the production or processing of goods3

Query 7Tags sit on top of the ordinary subclass: a Y02T family is also counted under H01R or B60L. CPC-only, so the Chinese and Japanese filings are under-represented.

05 · Connectors

H01R rose from 69.8% to 84.3% of the families between cohorts

Within H01R, 476 of the 535 families (89.0%) carry H01R 13/00, the details of coupling devices: contacts, housings, seals, locking, shielding. Direct conductive connections (H01R 4/00, 131), the machinery for making and assembling connectors (H01R 43/00, 102) and two-part coupling devices (H01R 24/00, 89) follow. Roughly a fifth of the H01R portfolio protects how the connectors are made.

Families by IPC main group within H01R (non-exclusive)

Data table: H01R main groups
IPC main groups within H01R
Main groupTitleFamiliesShare of 535 H01R families
H01R 13/00Details of coupling devices of the kinds covered by groups H01R 12/70 or H01R 24/00–H01R 33/0047689.0%
H01R 4/00Electrically-conductive connections between two or more conductive members in direct contact13124.5%
H01R 43/00Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing, assembling, maintaining or repairing line connectors10219.1%
H01R 24/00Two-part coupling devices, or either of their cooperating parts, characterised by their overall structure8916.6%
H01R 12/00Structural associations of mutually-insulated connecting elements specially adapted for printed circuits6311.8%
H01R 9/00Structural associations of mutually-insulated connecting elements, e.g. terminal strips or blocks499.2%
H01R 11/00Individual connecting elements providing two or more spaced connecting locations356.5%
H01R 31/00Coupling parts supported only by co-operation with counterpart336.2%
H01R 25/00Coupling parts adapted for simultaneous co-operation with two or more identical counterparts163.0%
H01R 101/00One pole (indexing code)142.6%
H01R 27/00Coupling parts adapted for co-operation with two or more dissimilar counterparts122.2%
H01R 35/00Flexible or turnable line connectors122.2%

Query 6The column sums to 1,032 across at most 535 families

Between the complete cohorts the portfolio moves inward. H01R's share rises from 69.8% to 84.3%, and cable installation (H02G, 3.2% to 8.5%), printed circuits (H05K, 6.7% to 9.0%) and electric-vehicle supply (B60L, 2.4% to 4.9%) rise with it. Shop fittings (A47F) fall from 15 families to 4, coin-freed apparatus (G07F) from 14 to 4, data processing (G06F) from 12 to 3. That cluster fits HARTING Systems, the retail-systems entity with 45 families; the report does not cross-tabulate entity against class, so this is an inference, not a measurement.

Share of cohort families carrying each IPC subclass (%)

Data table: technology shift
Technology shift between cohorts
IPC subclassFamilies 2014–2017Share of 252Families 2018–2021Share of 223
H01R17669.8%18884.3%
H05K176.7%209.0%
H02G83.2%198.5%
B60L62.4%114.9%
A47F156.0%41.8%
G07F145.6%41.8%
G06F124.8%31.3%
G01R114.4%41.8%

Query 6Both cohorts end before the incomplete years; shares do not sum to 100%

06 · Entities

HARTING Electric files 365 families and 60.6% of all applications

HARTING Electric, under its GmbH & Co. KG and its Stiftung & Co. KG form, is the applicant for 365 families and 1,415 applications. It also carries the international strategy: 3.88 applications per family against 3.32 for the portfolio. HARTING Electronics follows with 102 families, the holding entities with 69 and HARTING International Innovation AG with 67. The last is the newest name: every spelling carries a first filing year of 2023.

Families by applicant entity group (non-exclusive)

Data table: entity groups
Applicant entity groups
Entity groupFamiliesApplicationsApplications per familyShare of 2,334 applications
HARTING Electric / Electric Stiftung & Co. KG3651,4153.8860.6%
Office-side renderings (CN / JP)1872051.108.8%
HARTING Electronics GmbH (& Co. KG)1023243.1813.9%
Holding (HARTING AG & Co. KG / KGaA / Stiftung & Co. KG)691091.584.7%
HARTING International Innovation AG67871.303.7%
HARTING Systems GmbH (& Co. KG)45591.312.5%
HARTING Automotive GmbH31622.002.7%
HARTING (Zhuhai) Manufacturing Co., Ltd.22281.271.2%
HARTING Customised Solutions GmbH & Co. KG16271.691.2%
HARTING IT Software Development / Applied Technologies7131.860.6%
HARTING Corporation551.000.2%
HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG111.000.0%
Sum of rows (non-exclusive)9172,335——
Distinct total7042,3343.32100%

Query 5Rows sum to 917 families across 704

One row is not an entity. "Office-side renderings" holds the Chinese and Japanese spellings under which CNIPA and the JPO record HARTING's filings, without saying which German entity is behind each.

07 · Grants

Cohorts old enough to be decided reach grant shares of 50.0% to 60.5%

2014–2020

For families first filed 2014–2020 the granted share of applications sits between 50.0% and 60.5%. That band, not the portfolio average, describes HARTING's conversion rate.

2021

The share drops from 53.6% for the 2020 cohort to 17.7%. Examination takes three to five years.

2022–2024

3.8%, 2.6% and 4.6%: these rows measure pendency, not refusal, and are not a quality signal.

Granted share of applications by filing cohort (%)

Data table: grant status by cohort
Grant status by filing cohort (* still in examination)
Cohort (earliest filing year)ApplicationsGrantedGranted share
201421410750.0%
201527116460.5%
201619711960.4%
201726516060.4%
201820111557.2%
201919510553.8%
202023712753.6%
2021*2664717.7%
2022*18273.8%
2023*15542.6%
2024*15174.6%
Total2,33496241.2%

Query 5Hatched: cohorts still in examination

Across the whole window 325 of 704 families (46.2%) and 962 of 2,334 applications (41.2%) are recorded as granted. Among the larger offices the spread is wide: 78.7% at KIPO and 66.2% at the USPTO against 47.3% at the EPO and 24.7% at the DPMA. The low German figure fits the DPMA as the priority-establishing first filing (538 of 704 families file there); the report does not trace applications through withdrawal, continuation or grant.

Granted share of applications by office (%)

Data table: grant status by office
Grant status by office
OfficeApplicationsGrantedGranted share
RU3737100.0%
PL2323100.0%
CH6583.3%
KR13610778.7%
US31721066.2%
CN37619952.9%
EP38918447.3%
JP18527.8%
DE53813324.7%
CA1915.3%
GB3500.0%
DK22100.0%
ES22100.0%
MX200.0%
BR100.0%
WO (no grant in the PCT phase)433——

Query 5Applications, all cohorts. WO excluded: the PCT phase produces no grant.

The 35 GB applications show a granted count of zero. For a national office of that size this is more likely a gap in PATSTAT's grant flag than a real outcome; do not read it as ten years of unsuccessful UK filings.

08 · Inventors

Inventor teams per invention grew after 2018

525 distinct Latin-script inventors are named across 686 of the 704 families. The most frequently named appears on 44 families, 6.3% of the total; no one reaches 50. Every one of the fifteen most frequent is recorded in Germany. Two profiles show: Daniel Wesseler's 20 families are all from 2020–2024, as are Marc Genau's 26 of 28 and Sebastian Griepenstroh's 26 of 35, while Lutz Tröger (1 of 27), Heiko Herbrechtsmeier (1 of 19) and Bernard Schlegel (1 of 16) contributed almost entirely in the first half.

The fifteen most frequently named inventors, families

Data table: inventors
Most frequently named inventors
InventorCountryFamilies 2014–2024of which first filed 2020–2024
Meier, HeikoDE449
Griepenstroh, SebastianDE3526
Friesen, MarkusDE3317
Loske, FelixDE3114
Kropiewnicki, NorbertDE3017
Genau, MarcDE2826
Tröger, LutzDE271
Beimdieck, CarstenDE2618
Riechmann, TillDE2213
Kliever, WilhelmDE219
Ferderer, AlbertDE2111
Wesseler, DanielDE2020
Herbrechtsmeier, HeikoDE191
Schlegel, BernardDE161
Hellige, DennyDE1611

Query 8Latin-script renderings only

Distinct inventors per cohort move from a 2014–2020 range of 64 to 90 to 127 in 2021, 106 in 2023 and 125 in 2024, on family counts that did not rise as much. That is roughly 1.3 inventors per family in 2014–2018 against 1.6 to 1.8 from 2019: larger teams per invention. 2023 and 2024 are lower bounds.

Distinct inventors named per filing cohort

Data table: inventors per cohort
Inventors per filing cohort (* incomplete)
CohortDistinct inventorsFamilies with a named inventorInventors per such family
201464491.31
201590721.25
201673521.40
201788771.14
201872541.33
201980501.60
202079461.72
2021127691.84
2022*96621.55
2023*106761.39
2024*125791.58
All cohorts (distinct)525686—

Query 8Hatched: incomplete cohorts

How names were consolidated, and what is excluded. MEIER, HEIKO and MEIER HEIKO are merged on a punctuation-stripped key. Chinese and Japanese inventor renderings are not merged and are excluded: they carry a single Latin initial, so the key would collapse every CN inventor sharing that initial into one person. This costs no family that also has a Latin spelling (686 of 704 are covered). Different people with identical names cannot be separated.

09 · Citations

One holding-frame family draws 139 citations, more than twice the next

354 of 704 families (50.3%) have been cited at least once, drawing 2,755 citations in total. The most cited family, Holding frame for plug connectors (2014), accounts for 139 on its own. Four of the top ten are holding frames and three more are modular connectors or connector modules: the mechanism that lets one industrial connector carry interchangeable inserts. Liquid-cooled contact element (2016, 57) and Terminal unit for an actively cooled cable (2016, 40) concern cooled high-current contacts and, with Car charging plug-in connector (2017, 41), point at fast charging.

Ten most cited families, incoming citations

Data table: most cited families
Ten most cited families
DOCDB familyTitleEarliest filing yearIncoming citations
49475936Holding frame for plug connectors2014139
56925929Holding frame for plug connector modules that is fixible in a housing201567
52396325Holding frame for a plug-type connector201457
59501125Liquid-cooled contact element201657
53054818Modular plug connector201552
63372503Car charging plug-in connector201741
59631518Terminal unit for an actively cooled cable201640
56741022Holding frame for holding plug connector modules201540
63407004Modular connector for circuit boards201738
67184754Plug connector module for an industrial plug connector201838
All cited families354 families / 2,755 citations——

Query 8Titles from the EP, WO, US or GB member

Citation counts favour older families and are not a quality score. A family is cited only after it publishes and keeps accumulating citations for years; nine of the ten entries were first filed in 2014–2017. Citations are incoming references to any publication of the family from any citing document, without separating examiner from applicant citations.

10 · Partners

One external partner in eleven years

15 of 704 families (2.1%) name more than one applicant. Exactly one has an applicant outside the group: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, on two applications of a single family. On the other 14 families every co-applicant is another HARTING entity, most often HARTING Electric alongside itself under two spellings of its legal form. HARTING reaches 16 offices but shares almost none of its inventions outside the group.

Co-applicants on multi-applicant families, exactly as recorded

Co-applicantTypeRelationshipFamiliesApplications
The Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversityExternal partner12
HARTING Electric Stiftung & Co. KGCompanyGroup-internal99
Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KGCompanyGroup-internal89
HARTING Electric Stiftung &Co. KGCompanyGroup-internal22
HARTING ELECTRIC GMBH & CO., KGCompanyGroup-internal22
HARTING Electric & Stiftung & Co. KGCompanyGroup-internal11
HARTING IT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO. KGCompanyGroup-internal11
HARTING IT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO,. KGCompanyGroup-internal11
HARTING Electric Stiftung & Co., KGCompanyGroup-internal11
Harting Electric GmbH & Co., KGCompanyGroup-internal11
HARTING AG & CO. KGCompanyGroup-internal11
HARTIN Electric Stiftung & Co. KGCompanyGroup-internal (typo variant)11
HARTING ELECTRIC GMBH &CO. KGCompanyGroup-internal11
HARTING Electric Stiftung GmbH & Co. KGCompanyGroup-internal11

Query 8Individual name records, not disjoint: the group-internal rows add up to more than 14 families

Co-applicants are joined on the application, not the family. Sharing a DOCDB family is not co-filing. Molex LLC (one Chinese member) and DIAC Holdings LLC (EP, US and WO members of one family) appear on other members of HARTING families without ever sharing an application; they are excluded. The same rule keeps HARTING's own Chinese and Japanese renderings off the partner list, where they would otherwise rank as its largest collaborators.

11 · How we counted

How the numbers were counted

  • One family, one countCOUNT(DISTINCT docdb_family_id), pseudo-families excluded. A family's year is the earliest filing of any patent-of-invention member, taken without a year restriction and only then filtered to 2014–2024.
  • Who filed, by person_nameThe set is defined by applicant names (applt_seq_nr > 0), not by codes: a substring search on '%HARTING%' over filing years 2008–2026, plus the Chinese and Japanese renderings found through family overlap. han_name is a cross-check only.
  • Patents of inventionipr_type = 'PI'. PCT rate = families with any WO member ÷ all families (432 / 704 = 61.4%). Grant rate = granted applications ÷ applications, per office or per cohort.
  • Every breakdown overlapsThe fifteen IPC subclasses sum to 855, the twelve H01R main groups to 1,032, the entity table to 917 and office family counts to 2,296. Percentages are of 704 families or 2,334 applications. No pie charts.
Checks and limits
  • Utility models and designs excluded, a material exclusionWithin the same scope and years PATSTAT holds 244 utility-model families (259 applications: 160 at CN, 90 at DE, 1 at JP) and 9 design families (14 applications, all US). For a connector maker with Chinese manufacturing this is a real part of its protection activity; it is outside this report by definition.
  • 2022–2024 are incompleteAbout 18 months of publication delay plus national-phase lag. Applications per family fall from 3.4–4.7 (2014–2021) to 2.94, 2.04 and 1.66. Family counts for those years are lower bounds; no period comparison ends inside them.
  • Year definitionTaking the minimum over the filings inside the window would pin pre-2014 families to 2014; the sum-equals-total check passes under both readings. Taking the minimum over every member regardless of ipr_type gives 703 families instead of 704; 3 families in the set have a non-PI member filed before 2014.
  • Unclassified families12 of 704 families carry neither an IPC nor a CPC code, so classification shares rest on 692 classified families while expressed against 704.
  • IPC across all membersIPC is aggregated over all applications of a family, because roughly 45 % of international families carry diverging main classifications. Labels are left-joined so retired symbols are not dropped; none appeared untitled.
  • No code-set completion neededThe set comes from applicant names, so subtree, predecessor and retired-symbol rules do not apply. Classes only describe the set; no is_active filter was used.
  • Y codes are CPC-onlyThey sit on top of the ordinary subclass and under-represent offices that do not assign CPC.
  • Name review182 candidates reviewed, 65 variants kept. Excluded: the Chilean individuals Harting Glade and Harting Eckman, the Chilean Harting S.A., their Chinese renderings, and names that merely contain the string (HARTINGER, HARTINGTON and similar).
  • Undiscovered spelling errors remain possibleHARTIN Electric Stiftung & Co. KG was found only because it shares a family with correct spellings. A family filed only under a misspelling would not be found.
  • Two entity decisionsHARTING CORPORATION, with no country code, is in scope because four of its five families are shared with HARTING International Innovation and the holding. The GmbH & Co. KG and Stiftung & Co. KG forms are one company with a change of legal form: filings from 2008 to 2023 and from 2013 to 2025, overlapping in the data.
  • Renderings not attributableThe Chinese and Japanese renderings cannot be assigned to a German legal entity, so they form their own bucket (187 families).
  • Inventors are Latin-script renderings686 of 704 families are covered; people sharing a name cannot be separated.
  • Grant flagRates for the 2021–2024 cohorts are low because examination takes three to five years. The 35 GB applications carry zero grants, more plausibly a gap in the grant flag than an outcome.
  • Co-filing at application levelCo-applicants are joined on appln_id, never on docdb_family_id. Collaboration that never surfaces as a co-applicant record, such as joint development where only one party files, leaves no trace in tls207_pers_appln.
  • No external benchmark (QA Check 9)A web search for third-party portfolio figures returned only a prior mtc.berlin publication, rejected as circular. The scope is evidenced internally: candidates reviewed, both han_name directions checked, renderings verified independently.
  • WindowApplications before 2014, and families whose earliest patent-of-invention filing falls outside 2014–2024, are not part of the report.
  • EditionsComputed on 15 August 2026 against PATSTAT Spring 2026 (patstat-mtc.patstat_2026a), IPC 20260101 (in force 1 January 2026) and CPC 202608 (in force 1 August 2026), read from dpt_edition. Figures from other editions are not comparable.

The core metrics bundle: KPIs, annual series, offices, periods and entities in one scan

Query 5queries.sql · 10 queries · Queries 5–8 each rebuild the scope themselves

Release protocol

  1. Agentsearch + draftBuilds the name scope and queries PATSTAT read-only. Every number comes from SQL.
  2. Checks13 rulesEvery claim must trace back to a query; chart and table must agree.
  3. Reviewsubject expertChecks scope, counts and wording before publication.
  4. Approvalsecond personA second person not involved in the report approves publication.

Next step

Which company should we profile for you?

A report like this one starts at 1,500 € plus VAT. Or learn to build it yourself on the EPO's Technology Intelligence Platform.

Book a scoping call · Training for PATLIB centres