Technology landscape · Rare earth elements · 2014–2024

Rare earth patent filings have run flat since 2016; China and recycling gain inside that plateau.

32,931 patent families on extraction, compounds, alloys, magnets, phosphors and recycling. 82% of them include a filing at CNIPA.

Data
EPO PATSTAT Global, Spring 2026 (patstat_2026a)
Unit
DOCDB family
Scope
Rare-earth places in eight IPC/CPC subclasses
Queries
0–12, all published
Families per filing year · rows: C22C, C09K, H01F, C01F, C22B · 2023 and 2024 provisionalQuery 6
  1. 73.9%

    growth from 1,940 families (2014) to 3,373 (2016). Every year since sits between 2,860 and 3,395.

    Growth
  2. 83.9%

    of the families first filed in 2019–2022 include a CNIPA filing, up from 77.1% in 2014–2018.

    Where
  3. 20.3%

    of the 2022 families carry a recycling or recovery class, up from 12.9% in 2014.

    Recycling
  4. 646

    families make Nippon Steel the largest applicant group. The top two are Japanese steelmakers.

    Applicants
  5. 22.9%

    more university families per year in 2019–2024 than in 2014–2018; corporate filings fell 13.6%.

    Sectors

01 · Growth

Essentially all the growth came in the first two years

2014–2016

The landscape grew by 73.9%, from 1,940 to 3,373 families a year.

2016–2022

Every year since 2016 sits between 2,860 and 3,395 families. The 2022 peak of 3,395 is less than one per cent above 2016. From 2014 to 2022 the field grew 75.0%, a compound annual rate of 7.3%, essentially all of it in the first two years.

Read with care

2023 and 2024 are provisional: applications publish about 18 months after filing. No growth rate is quoted through either year.

Patent families by earliest filing year

Data table: filing activity 2014–2024
Families by earliest filing year (* provisional)
Filing yearPatent familiesYear-on-year
20141,940–
20152,240+15.5%
20163,373+50.6%
20173,073−8.9%
20183,376+9.9%
20192,860−15.3%
20203,189+11.5%
20213,035−4.8%
20223,395+11.9%
2023*3,277−3.5%
2024*3,173−3.2%
Total32,931–

Query 2Hatched: provisional years

02 · Where

China gained 6.8 points of share, taken from the national routes

26,990 families (82%) include a filing at CNIPA. The share comparison uses complete filing years only, because a family first filed in 2023 or 2024 has not finished its international filing programme. CNIPA appears in 77.1% of families first filed in 2014–2018 and in 83.9% of those from 2019–2022. Japan falls 3.3 points to 18.7%, the United States 2.8 to 19.2%, Taiwan 0.9 to 3.7%, Korea 0.8 to 11.8% and Germany 1.0 to 2.0%. The EPO holds 13.4% in both periods and the PCT route edges up from 18.5% to 19.3%.

Share of period families with a filing at each office (%), complete filing years

Data table: office share by period
Office share by period, complete filing years
Office2014–2018 familiesShare of period2019–2022 familiesShare of periodChange
CN10,79977.1%10,47583.9%+6.8 pts
US3,08022.0%2,39319.2%−2.8 pts
JP3,06921.9%2,32818.7%−3.3 pts
WO2,58818.5%2,40819.3%+0.8 pts
EP1,87313.4%1,67513.4%±0.0 pts
KR1,77212.7%1,47711.8%−0.8 pts
TW6424.6%4603.7%−0.9 pts
DE4243.0%2502.0%−1.0 pts
All families in period14,002100%12,479100%–

Query 4Shares of 14,002 and 12,479 families; they sum above 100%

Patent families with a filing at each office, 2014–2024

Data table: families by filing office
Patent families by filing office, 2014–2024
OfficePatent familiesShare of 32,931
CN China (CNIPA)26,99082.0%
JP Japan (JPO)5,75117.5%
US United States (USPTO)5,74817.5%
WO PCT5,61917.1%
EP European Patent Office3,74711.4%
KR Republic of Korea (KIPO)3,53510.7%
TW Taiwan1,1943.6%
MX Mexico9442.9%
DE Germany (DPMA)7372.2%
CA Canada6211.9%
RU Russia5311.6%
AU Australia4661.4%
BR Brazil4401.3%

Query 3A family counts at every office where it has a member

Period shares sum above 100% because one family reaches several offices. The periods cover five and four filing years, so absolute counts are not comparable between them; shares are. The office totals cover the full window 2014–2024.

03 · Technology

Refining grew 79.2% while phosphors declined from 2018

Alloys (C22C, 9,585 families) and luminescent materials (C09K, 9,524) are the largest sub-areas, ahead of magnets (H01F, 6,149). A family classified both as an alloy and as a magnetic material appears under both, so the subclass counts sum to 34,899 against 32,931 distinct families.

Patent families per classification subclass

Data table: families per subclass
Patent families per classification subclass
SubclassFieldPatent families
C22CAlloys: rare-earth-containing steels, magnesium and nickel alloys9,585
C09KLuminescent materials containing rare earth metals9,524
H01FMagnets and magnetic materials, Nd-Fe-B and related6,149
C01FCompounds of rare earth metals4,294
C22BProduction and refining of rare earth metals3,869
C01GComplex oxides of other metals containing rare earths582
C30BSingle crystals containing rare earth metals547
B22FRare-earth intermetallic powders and powder metallurgy349
Sum of subclassesnon-exclusive34,899
Distinct families32,931

Query 5Non-exclusive; sums above 32,931

Refining

Extraction and refining metallurgy (C22B) grows from 264 families in 2014 to 473 in 2022, a rise of 79.2%, slightly ahead of the 75.0% of the landscape as a whole.

Phosphors

Luminescent materials (C09K) peak at 1,105 families in 2018 and fall to 822 by 2022, a decline of 25.6% from the peak, consistent with a maturing phosphor field.

Magnets

Magnets (H01F) are the most stable large block, within a band of 468 to 663 families a year and with no clear direction. Compounds (C01F) grow modestly.

Families per filing year, five largest sub-areas

Data table: sub-areas by filing year
Five largest sub-areas by filing year (* provisional)
Filing yearC22C AlloysC09K LuminescentH01F MagnetsC01F CompoundsC22B Production
2014380592468286264
2015550647548284285
20161,1981,011566362310
2017961978570341318
20181,0531,105529442308
2019853944476364318
2020923960594458336
2021912870526390367
20221,006822638483473
2023*883821663424450
2024*866774571460440

Query 62023 and 2024 provisional

The largest individual classification places

CodeClassification placePatent families
C22C38/005Ferrous alloys containing rare earths (Sc, Y, lanthanides)6,691
H01F1/057Permanent magnets of rare earth and group IIIa elements, e.g. Nd2Fe14B4,364
C22B59/00Obtaining rare earth metals3,869
C09K11/77Luminescent materials containing rare earth metals2,407
H01F1/0577Sintered rare-earth permanent magnets1,937
C09K11/80Rare-earth luminescent materials containing aluminium or gallium1,603
C01F17/00Compounds of rare earth metals1,593
C01F17/10Preparation, separation or purification of rare earth compounds1,553
C22C23/06Magnesium alloys with a rare earth metal as next major constituent1,329
C09K11/78Rare-earth luminescent materials containing oxygen1,311
C09K11/85Rare-earth luminescent materials containing halogen1,251
H01F41/0293Grain-boundary diffusion of rare earth elements (Tb, Dy, Ho) into magnets1,241
C09K2211/182Organic electroluminescent complexes of the rare earth metals1,208
C22C28/00Alloys based on a metal not covered elsewhere (rare-earth-based alloys)1,159
H01F1/055Permanent magnets of rare earth and transition metals936

Query 5Non-exclusive: a family appears in every row that applies to it

04 · Applicants

Two Japanese steelmakers lead a field that is 82% Chinese

Nippon Steel (646 families) and JFE Steel (534) lead, which fits the largest single place in the landscape, C22C38/005 ferrous alloys containing rare earths (6,691 families). The Chinese side is led by academic and state research bodies: Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (346), Northeastern University (241), Central South University (232) and the Baotou Research Institute of Rare Earths (227). Baotou Iron and Steel (320) is the largest Chinese company. The twenty groups account for 5,088 family mentions, at most 15.4% of the landscape: a dispersed field.

Twenty largest applicant groups, patent families 2014–2024

  1. 01Nippon Steel Company646
  2. 02JFE Steel Company534
  3. 03Jiangxi University of Science and Technology University346
  4. 04Nichia Company329
  5. 05Baotou Iron and Steel Company320
  6. 06TDK Company317
  7. 07Hitachi Metals / Proterial Company283
  8. 08Northeastern University University241
  9. 09Panasonic / Matsushita Company235
  10. 10Central South University University232
  11. 11Baotou Research Institute of Rare Earths Gov / non-profit227
  12. 12Grirem Advanced Materials Company206
  13. 13Toyota Company204
  14. 14Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (CAS) Research201
  15. 15Sumitomo Metal Mining Company179
  16. 16Toshiba Company138
  17. 17Osram Company137
  18. 18Shin-Etsu Chemical Company127
  19. 19Beijing Zhong Ke San Huan Hi-Tech Company106
  20. 20Zhenghai Magnetic Material Company80

Query 7Consolidated across harmonised name variants; co-filed families count for each partner

Name variants: han_name does not group an organisation across spellings, scripts and corporate history. The same steelmaker appears as NIPPON STEEL CORP and NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP, and JFE Steel under three spellings including a full-width Japanese form. The counts merge such variants under a documented rule; no rule catches every variant, so all applicant counts are a lower bound. PATSTAT records no applicant country for most families, so organisations sharing a name across countries (Northeastern University among them) cannot be separated on the data alone.

05 · Outside China

Ten of the eleven largest applicants recorded outside China are Japanese

The eleventh is German: Osram Opto Semiconductors, in phosphors and LEDs. No applicant recorded in the United States, Korea, France or the United Kingdom reaches the threshold of 85 families, although the USPTO receives 5,748 families and KIPO 3,535: those filings are spread across many applicants. The Japanese names span the value chain: steel and alloys, magnets and components, phosphors and lighting, specialty chemicals and end-use manufacturing.

Applicants with a recorded country outside China, patent families

Data table: non-Chinese applicants
Applicants with a recorded non-Chinese country
Applicant (harmonised name)CountryPatent families
NIPPON STEEL CORPJP547
JFE STEEL CORPJP534
NICHIA CORPJP218
MATSUSHITA ELECT IND CO LTDJP206
TDK CORPJP191
NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPJP162
TOYOTA JIDOSHA CO LTDJP106
SHIN ETSU CHEM CO LTDJP101
CO LTD TOSHIBAJP92
DENKA CO LTDJP90
OSRAM OPTO SEMICONDUCTORS GMBHDE89

Query 8Harmonised names as PATSTAT records them

A country code is recorded for only a minority of applicants in this field, so this ranking is a lower bound. NIPPON STEEL CORP and NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP are successive names of one filer, together 646 families after consolidation. The chart keeps the PATSTAT names so that each bar can be reproduced from the query; consolidated figures are in the Applicants chapter.

06 · Recycling

Recycling filings rose from 250 to 690 families a year

Families that also carry a recycling or secondary-recovery class (C22B7, H01M10/54, Y02W30, Y02P10/20) grow by 176.0% from 2014 to 2022, a compound annual rate of 13.5%, against 75.0% and 7.3% for the landscape. Their share of annual filings goes from 12.9% in 2014 and a trough of 10.2% in 2016 to 20.3% in 2022, holding near 19% in the two provisional years. Over the whole period 4,654 of 32,931 families (14.1%) carry such a class.

Patent families by filing year, recycling and recovery against the rest

Data table: recycling by filing year
Recycling and recovery by filing year (* provisional)
Filing yearAll familiesRecycling / recoveryShare
20141,94025012.9%
20152,24029012.9%
20163,37334510.2%
20173,07332310.5%
20183,37635310.5%
20192,86033411.7%
20203,18939412.4%
20213,03545415.0%
20223,39569020.3%
2023*3,27762319.0%
2024*3,17359818.8%
Total32,9314,65414.1%

Query 9Hatched: provisional years

Scheme coverage: Y02W30 and Y02P10/20 are CPC tagging schemes with no IPC equivalent. Of the 4,654 recycling families, 3,314 are reachable only through CPC and 1,340 through IPC, and 3,268 carry a Y tag without either scheme-neutral code. Offices that assign IPC but little CPC are under-represented; in a landscape that is 82% Chinese the recycling figures are a floor.

07 · Partners

The four largest resolvable co-filing pairs stay inside one group

3,875 of the 32,931 families (11.8%) carry more than one applicant; roughly nine in ten are filed by a single organisation. Each of the four largest pairs that resolve to complete names on both sides joins two entities of the same group: a parent and its materials subsidiary, or two successive names of one filer. The largest co-filing relationship overall, 78 families, is centred on Fujian Changting Golden Dragon Rare-Earth Co., Ltd. Cross-organisational collaboration exists, but not at a scale that changes the landscape.

Largest co-applicant pairs with complete names on both sides

Applicant AApplicant BCo-filed families
NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPNIPPON STEEL CORP61
CO LTD TOSHIBATOSHIBA MATERIALS CO LTD25
HYUNDAI MOTOR COKIA CORP25
GRIREM ADVANCED MATERIALS CO LTDGRIREM HI TECH CO LTD22

Query 10Affiliated entities are not merged

Pairs are counted from applications with two or more distinct harmonised names, each unordered pair once, so an applicant cannot appear in its own partner list. Affiliated entities are not merged, which is why intra-group pairs stay visible. That is a property of the data, not an error.

08 · Sectors

University filings per year rose between the periods, corporate filings fell

Companies hold 16,921 of the 32,931 families (51.4%), universities 10,582 (32.1%). Per year, university filings rise 22.9% between 2014–2018 and 2019–2024 while corporate filings fall 13.6%. Public research bodies stay at about 155 a year; university-affiliated research bodies grow 35.2%, from 93 to 125. Individual inventors fall from 164 to 62 a year, a decline of 61.9%. This chapter uses the full window, unlike the office comparison.

Families per filing year by applicant sector, two periods

Data table: applicant sectors by period
Applicant sectors by period
SectorFamilies 2014–2018Per yearFamilies 2019–2024Per yearAll families
Company8,3071,6618,6141,43616,921
University4,2768556,3061,05110,582
Government / non-profit7651539291551,694
Government-non-profit university463937511251,214
Individual818164374621,192
No sector assigned398804,4607434,858
Distinct families in the landscape32,931

Minor sectors below 100 families (hospital, mixed company-and-public) are omitted; they add 141 families. Sector sums exceed the distinct total because a family can carry applicants from several sectors.

Query 11Per year, so five- and six-year periods compare; sectors not exclusive

Unassigned sectors: families with no sector rise from 80 to 743 a year. PATSTAT's sector assignment lags for recently added person records; this is not a new class of applicant. Because those 4,858 families are missing from every sector line, the 2019–2024 figures are understated to an unknown degree. Read the comparison as directional, not exact.

09 · Citations

79.2% of the families from 2014–2019 have been cited

20,402 of the 32,931 families (61.9%) have been cited at least once, with 89,510 citing-family links in total, 2.72 per family. For families first filed in 2014–2019 the cited share is 79.2% (13,356 of 16,862). 2,111 families (6.4%) have been cited by ten or more families. The most cited family has 317 citing families; the second, an atomic-layer-deposition coating of fluorinated rare earth oxide for semiconductor chamber components, 238.

Average citing DOCDB families per patent family, by filing year

Data table: forward citations by filing year
Forward citations by filing year
Filing yearFamiliesCiting familiesPer family
20141,94013,0916.75
20152,24012,9325.77
20163,37314,6664.35
20173,07312,5434.08
20183,37610,8523.21
20192,8608,2982.90
20203,1897,0672.22
20213,0354,9561.63
20223,3953,1500.93
20233,2771,3130.40
20243,1736420.20
Total32,93189,5102.72

Query 12Only the older years carry information about impact

The falling bars are a measurement artefact: a family first filed in 2024 has had almost no time to be cited. Forward-citation counts for recent filing years are structurally near zero and must not be read as impact.

10 · How we counted

How the numbers were counted

  • One family, one countA DOCDB family counts once, in its earliest filing year; the yearly counts sum to 32,931. Only patents of invention (ipr_type PI); utility models, designs and pseudo-families (docdb_family_id = 0) are excluded.
  • Rare earth as the subjectOnly places in which the rare earth is the classified subject matter, in eight subclasses: C22B, C01F, C01G, C22C, H01F, C09K, C30B, B22F.
  • IPC and CPC together16,162 families are found by both schemes, 11,307 only through CPC and 5,462 only through IPC. Neither scheme alone is sufficient, so the report counts the union.
  • Predecessors restrictedA predecessor symbol is kept only where it names rare earths or lanthanides. The unrestricted union gives 45,796 families, the restricted one 32,931; the true figure lies between the two.
Checks and limits
  • Data basisComputed on 15 August 2026 against EPO PATSTAT Global, Spring 2026 (patstat-mtc.patstat_2026a), IPC edition 20260101 (in force 1 January 2026), CPC edition 202608 (in force 1 August 2026).
  • How the code set was foundThree entry points: the WIPO catchword index (rare earth, lanthanides), title breadcrumbs (title_full) and CPC definition texts. SEARCH() does not stem, so singular and plural were searched separately; on CPC titles the singular returns 327 symbols and the plural 589. Together: 962 joinable CPC symbols and 143 IPC symbols.
  • How it was completedSubtree expansion via the parent relation (CPC grows from 962 to 1,336 symbols; IPC does not grow). Retired symbols added by a prefix pass bounded to NOT is_active (18 CPC symbols). Predecessors joined from the reclassification chains. No code list was filtered on is_active.
  • Predecessor costC01G53/00 (nickel compounds), C01G51/00 (cobalt compounds) and C01G45/12 (manganese complex oxides) are broad parents that spawned a rare-earth subgroup; their contents are mostly lithium-ion cathode chemistry. Excluding them removes 12,865 families as a deliberate precision decision.
  • Application-domain tags excludedCodes where a rare earth is a constituent of another technology (C08F, C04B, B01J, C03C, H01S, H01M and others) cover 100,175 additional families with no core code. A sample of 24 read as polypropylene compositions, refractory bricks, cordierite beads and polycrystalline diamond, far past the one-in-five off-topic threshold.
  • Title-only families not in scope9,796 families with rare earth in the English title carry no rare-earth code, an additional 29.7%. A sample of 20 read as on topic (doped fibres, magnet motors, molten-salt cells, flotation agents), so this is a real recall gap. It stays open because an English-title layer would make the landscape inconsistent across offices.
  • Recycling cut is CPC-weighted3,314 of the 4,654 recycling families are reachable only through CPC.
  • Filing-office geographyApplicant country is mostly unrecorded, so the geography shows where protection is sought, not where the invention was made.
  • Applicant namesHarmonised names do not group spellings, scripts and corporate history; the consolidation catches the largest variant groups only. Counts are a lower bound. Applicants are taken with applt_seq_nr > 0.
  • Provisional years2023 and 2024 are still filling up. No growth rate ends in either year.
  • Grant rate62.5% for the 2014–2019 cohort, which is old enough to be mostly decided. Across all filing years it is 55.2%, a figure that measures examination speed as much as success.
  • Utility models excluded2,942 families in the period are utility-model-only and not counted.
  • OverlapsClasses, offices and sectors overlap, so their sub-totals exceed the family total. Every such table states its sum next to the distinct total.
  • No external magnitude checkNo independent family count for a comparable scope could be obtained. Recent peer-reviewed patent studies describe a China-centred landscape and rising recycling, consistent with this report, but no numeric cross-check is claimed.
  • AcknowledgementThe initial framing (classification codes for rare-earth extraction and recovery combined with a proximity text search) was provided by Riccardo Priore, PhD, Centro Patlib, AREA SCIENCE PARK, Trieste.

The CODESET block that every query repeats

Query 1queries.sql · Queries 0–12 with the code-set construction

Release protocol

  1. Agentsearch + draftBuilt the code set and queried PATSTAT read-only through the patstat-mcp server. Every number comes from SQL.
  2. Checks13 rulesEvery claim must trace back to a query; chart and table must agree.
  3. Reviewsubject expertChecks scope, counts and wording before publication.
  4. Approvalsecond personA second person not involved in the report approves publication.

Next step

Which technology or region should we count for you?

A report like this one starts at 1,500 € plus VAT. Or learn to build it yourself on the EPO's Technology Intelligence Platform.

Book a scoping call · Training for PATLIB centres