Company profile · B. Braun Melsungen AG · 2014–2024

B. Braun's patent work is moving away from dialysis toward instrumented surgery.

1,450 patent families and 5,151 applications at 36 offices, filed by eight group entities including Aesculap AG. 93.4% of the families fall into medical technology.

Data
EPO PATSTAT Global, Spring 2026 (patstat_2026a)
Unit
DOCDB family, by earliest filing year
Scope
B. Braun group incl. Aesculap AG · patents of invention
Queries
8, all published
Families by filing office · rows from front to back: 2014–2018 (558 families), 2019–2022 (568 families)Query 4
  1. 41.8%

    of the families (606) come from Aesculap AG, more than from the Melsungen headquarters (437).

    Entities
  2. 27.2%

    more families a year in 2019–2022 (142.0) than in 2014–2018 (111.6).

    Filing trend
  3. 63.2%

    of the families first filed 2019–2022 carry a PCT application, up from 42.7%.

    Offices
  4. 20

    families on surgical robots (A61B 34/30) in 2019–2022, against 1 in 2014–2018.

    Moving
  5. 2.8%

    of the families (41) have a co-applicant from outside the group.

    Partners

01 · Entities

Aesculap, not the parent company, is the group's largest filer

The report covers the group: B. Braun Melsungen AG, the subsidiaries that file under a B. Braun name, and Aesculap AG, the wholly owned surgical-technology arm in Tuttlingen. Aesculap accounts for 606 of 1,450 families (41.8%), the Melsungen headquarters for 437 (30.1%), B. Braun Avitum AG, the dialysis division, for 247, and B. Braun New Ventures GmbH, the innovation unit, for 59. Aesculap records harmonise to AESCULAP AG, so a search anchored on the parent name reaches none of the 606 Aesculap families.

Patent families by B. Braun group entity, 2014–2024

Data table: families by group entity
Patent families and applications by group entity
Filing entity (consolidated name variants)FamiliesApplicationsShare of 1,450
Aesculap AG (surgical technology, Tuttlingen)6062,25441.8%
B. Braun Melsungen AG (headquarters)4371,55230.1%
B. Braun Avitum AG (dialysis)24783417.0%
B. Braun New Ventures GmbH591604.1%
B. Braun Medical (US / FR / other)541883.7%
B. Braun China entities (Suzhou, Jiangsu, Beijing, Shanghai)38382.6%
B. Braun Surgical S.A. (Spain)211111.4%
B. Braun Miethke GmbH4240.3%
Distinct families (group total)1,4505,151100%

Query 3 · 17.9 GBEntity rows sum to 1,466: 16 families are co-filed by two group entities and appear under both

02 · Filing trend

The group files more families a year than at the start of the decade

2014–2018

558 families, 111.6 a year. The trough is 2017 with 94.

2019–2022

568 families, 142.0 a year: 27.2% more per year than in 2014–2018. The highest complete year is 2021 with 165 families and 604 applications.

Read with care

2023 and 2024 are provisional: applications are published about 18 months after priority. The 2024 value is a lower bound. Both years are excluded from every trend statement.

Patent families by first filing year

Data table: filing trend 2014–2024
Families by first filing year, and own applications filed (* provisional)
First filing yearPatent familiesYear on yearOwn applications filed
2014129—431
2015111−14.0%474
2016119+7.2%514
201794−21.0%389
2018105+11.7%425
2019125+19.0%480
2020134+7.2%549
2021165+23.1%604
2022144−12.7%528
2023*193+34.0%483
2024*131−32.1%274
Total1,450—5,151

Query 3 · 17.9 GB5,151 applications across 1,450 families: 3.55 own applications per family

03 · Offices

The PCT share rose from 42.7% to 63.2% of families

Germany is the most used office: 1,085 of 1,450 families (74.8%) have a DE filing, ahead of EP (996, 68.7%) and US (849, 58.6%). 737 families (50.8%) contain a WO member. Between the two complete periods the WO share rose from 42.7% to 63.2% and China from 30.8% to 39.8%. Direct national filings moved the other way: Japan from 19.7% to 6.2%, Spain from 22.2% to 12.7%, Singapore from 3.9% to 0.7%, Russia from 4.3% to none. This is consistent with the PCT route replacing direct national filings, but it is not proof of it.

Families with a filing at each office, 2014–2024

Data table: top filing offices
Families with a filing at each office, 2014–2024
OfficeFamiliesApplicationsShare of 1,450 families
DE — Germany1,0851,08574.8%
EP — European Patent Office9961,07068.7%
US — United States84990858.6%
WO — PCT (WIPO)73174650.4%
CN — China46548332.1%
ES — Spain19721313.6%
JP — Japan16718311.5%
AU — Australia71914.9%
PL — Poland56583.9%
BR — Brazil51533.5%
KR — Korea36382.5%
CA — Canada29322.0%
SG — Singapore26321.8%
RU — Russia24251.7%
PT — Portugal20221.4%
MX — Mexico19201.3%
DK — Denmark18201.2%
19 further offices (HK, HU, IL, MY, ZA, FR, GB, TW, EA, TR, IT, CL, AT, DO, FI, NL, BE, SA, SE)≤ 12 each——

Query 4 · 18.2 GB36 offices in all. The WO row counts the 731 families in which a group entity is itself the PCT applicant.

Share of period families filed at each office (%)

Data table: office coverage by period
Office coverage by period (share of period families)
Office2014–2018 familiesShare of 5582019–2022 familiesShare of 568Change (pp)
DE43177.2%43576.6%−0.6
EP38368.6%43376.2%+7.6
US36365.1%37265.5%+0.4
WO23842.7%35963.2%+20.5
CN17230.8%22639.8%+9.0
ES12422.2%7212.7%−9.5
JP11019.7%356.2%−13.5
AU274.8%386.7%+1.9
PL325.7%234.0%−1.7
BR213.8%305.3%+1.5
KR112.0%213.7%+1.7
SG223.9%40.7%−3.2
RU244.3%00.0%−4.3

Query 4 · 18.2 GBPeriods of 558 and 568 families; both end before 2023

National-phase timing distorts the second period. A PCT application enters the national phase up to 30 months after priority, and the national application is published later still. For families first filed in 2021 or 2022 many national-phase filings are not yet in the Spring 2026 edition. The falling national shares in the 2019–2022 column are a lower bound; the rising WO share is not affected.

04 · Technology fields

93.4% of the families sit in medical technology

1,355 of 1,450 families carry the WIPO field Medical technology. The second field, Handling, reaches 135 (9.3%). All 35 fields appear somewhere in the portfolio, down to Basic communication processes with one family. Computer technology grows fastest in relative terms, from 5.4 families a year in 2014–2018 to 12.5 in 2019–2022; Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy moves from 2.0 to 7.3. Both are small bases: directional signals, not established trends.

Patent families per WIPO technology field (non-exclusive)

Data table: all 35 WIPO fields
All 35 WIPO technology fields; families per year in brackets
WIPO fieldSectorFamilies2014–2018 (per year)2019–2022 (per year)
Medical technologyInstruments1,355525 (105.0)536 (134.0)
HandlingMechanical engineering13558 (11.6)45 (11.3)
MeasurementInstruments11242 (8.4)45 (11.3)
Computer technologyElectrical engineering10427 (5.4)50 (12.5)
Mechanical elementsMechanical engineering9636 (7.2)41 (10.3)
Chemical engineeringChemistry8840 (8.0)26 (6.5)
Machine toolsMechanical engineering5321 (4.2)25 (6.3)
Engines, pumps, turbinesMechanical engineering4719 (3.8)16 (4.0)
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energyElectrical engineering4610 (2.0)29 (7.3)
Other special machinesMechanical engineering4619 (3.8)17 (4.3)
PharmaceuticalsChemistry3312 (2.4)11 (2.8)
ControlInstruments3210 (2.0)14 (3.5)
Audio-visual technologyElectrical engineering3014 (2.8)13 (3.3)
Analysis of biological materialsInstruments2813 (2.6)12 (3.0)
Environmental technologyChemistry237 (1.4)5 (1.3)
TelecommunicationsElectrical engineering229 (1.8)10 (2.5)
Digital communicationElectrical engineering223 (0.6)11 (2.8)
Surface technology, coatingChemistry219 (1.8)6 (1.5)
OpticsInstruments218 (1.6)10 (2.5)
Materials, metallurgyChemistry217 (1.4)11 (2.8)
Basic materials chemistryChemistry156 (1.2)7 (1.8)
BiotechnologyChemistry103 (0.6)4 (1.0)
IT methods for managementElectrical engineering101 (0.2)7 (1.8)
Organic fine chemistryChemistry101 (0.2)7 (1.8)
Civil engineeringOther fields105 (1.0)4 (1.0)
Furniture, gamesOther fields94 (0.8)5 (1.3)
SemiconductorsElectrical engineering73 (0.6)4 (1.0)
Macromolecular chemistry, polymersChemistry62 (0.4)4 (1.0)
TransportMechanical engineering61 (0.2)3 (0.8)
Textile and paper machinesMechanical engineering63 (0.6)2 (0.5)
Other consumer goodsOther fields52 (0.4)3 (0.8)
Thermal processes and apparatusMechanical engineering42 (0.4)0 (0.0)
Food chemistryChemistry31 (0.2)2 (0.5)
Micro-structural and nano-technologyChemistry20 (0.0)1 (0.3)
Basic communication processesElectrical engineering10 (0.0)1 (0.3)

Query 5 · 26.0 GBOne family can carry several fields, so the column sums above 1,450. The periods cover 5 and 4 complete years; compare the per-year values.

05 · IPC classes

A61B and A61M cover the surgical and the infusion halves of the group

A61B (Diagnosis; Surgery; Identification) appears on 692 families (47.7%) and A61M (devices for introducing media into or onto the body) on 609 (42.0%). Outside the classic medical subclasses, healthcare informatics (G16H) rises from 3.2 families a year in 2014–2018 to 12.0 in 2019–2022 and graphical data reading (G06K) from 1.2 to 5.5. Separation (B01D), the filters and membranes of dialysis, falls from 5.4 to 3.0.

Patent families per IPC subclass (non-exclusive)

Data table: IPC subclasses
IPC subclasses with 15 or more families
IPC subclassTitleFamilies2014–20182019–2022
A61BDiagnosis; Surgery; Identification692257308
A61MDevices for introducing media into, or onto, the body609252208
A61LSterilising; Materials for prostheses; Disinfection1839266
A61FFilters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses1767075
G16HHealthcare informatics1031648
A61JContainers for medical or pharmaceutical purposes1013536
B65DContainers for storage or transport of articles964832
B01DSeparation592712
G01NInvestigating or analysing materials572519
G06FElectric digital data processing512017
F04BPositive-displacement machines for liquids; Pumps401712
B29CShaping or joining of plastics321611
F16LPipes; Joints or fittings for pipes321017
A61KPreparations for medical, dental or toiletry purposes31129
G06KGraphical data reading; Presentation of data31622
F16KValves; Taps; Cocks27188
F16BDevices for fastening or securing constructional elements26612
A61CDentistry; Oral or dental hygiene25516
B25JManipulators; Chambers with manipulation devices2429
B65BMachines or methods for packaging articles22114
A61PSpecific therapeutic activity of chemical compounds2177
G06TImage data processing or generation2039
B01JChemical or physical processes, e.g. catalysis1779
B33YAdditive manufacturing1748
G01MTesting static or dynamic balance of machines1745
H01RElectrically-conductive connections1629
G02BOptical elements, systems or apparatus1677
F04CRotary-piston positive-displacement machines1654
G01LMeasuring force, stress, torque, work16311
H04LTransmission of digital information1516

Query 5 · 26.0 GBEvery IPC symbol from every family member; counts sum well above 1,450

The 25 largest IPC main groups: surgical instruments on the A61B side, dialysis and infusion on the A61M side

IPC main groupTitleFamilies
A61B 17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods204
A61M 1/16Blood treatment with membranes181
A61M 1/14Dialysis systems; Artificial kidneys; Blood oxygenators132
A61B 90/00Instruments or accessories for surgery or diagnosis130
A61M 5/142Pressure infusion, e.g. using pumps110
A61M 1/36Treatment of blood in a by-pass of the natural circulation109
A61M 5/14Infusion devices; Blood infusion102
A61M 25/00Catheters; Hollow probes97
A61L 2/26Sterilising accessories89
A61B 50/30Containers for packaging or sterilising surgical instruments89
A61F 2/46Special tools for implanting artificial joints86
A61F 2/30Joint prostheses84
A61B 17/16Instruments for osteoclasis; Drills81
A61B 34/20Surgical navigation systems; Tracking devices81
A61M 25/06Body-piercing guide needles79
A61B 17/56Surgical instruments for treatment of bones78
A61M 39/10Tube connectors or tube couplings77
A61M 1/00Suction or pumping devices for medical purposes75
A61M 5/168Means for controlling media flow to the body73
A61F 2/38Prostheses for elbows or knees69
A61B 17/70Spinal positioners or stabilisers67
A61B 50/00Containers, covers or holders for medical instruments58
A61B 17/28Surgical forceps52
A61M 5/32Needles; Details of needles47
A61B 34/30Surgical robots47

Query 5 · 26.0 GBRetired symbols are joined with an outer join; none reached the reporting threshold

06 · Grants

72.7% of EP applications are granted, 5.9% of German ones

At the offices that examine substantively, the group reaches 72.7% at the EPO (459 of 631 applications), 75.1% in the US (443 of 590) and 79.5% in Japan (105 of 132). China is lower at 46.1% (131 of 284). Only 38 of 640 DE applications (5.9%) are recorded as granted, although DE is the most frequent filing in the portfolio (1,085 families). This fits a German priority filing pursued through EP or PCT; the data show the outcome, not the intention. Across the whole period 747 of 1,450 families (51.5%) contain a granted member, and 1,988 of 5,151 applications (38.6%) are granted.

Grant rate by office, applications filed 2014–2020 (%)

Data table: grant rate by office
Grant rate by office, 2014–2020 filing cohort
OfficeApplicationsGrantedGrant rateExamination
DE — Germany640385.9%substantive on request
EP — European Patent Office63145972.7%substantive
US — United States59044375.1%substantive
CN — China28413146.1%substantive
ES — Spain180180100.0%registration / partial
JP — Japan13210579.5%substantive
AU — Australia674770.1%substantive
PL — Poland4646100.0%registration / partial
BR — Brazil432251.2%substantive
SG — Singapore320n/agrant data not covered
RU — Russia2525100.0%registration / partial
KR — Korea231356.5%substantive
DK — Denmark2020100.0%registration / partial
PT — Portugal2020100.0%registration / partial
CA — Canada20945.0%substantive

Query 4 · 18.2 GBGrey: offices that register rather than examine. Offices with fewer than 20 applications omitted. The Examination column is a reading aid, not a PATSTAT value.

Pendency and coverage. Later filings are still in examination, so the cohort ends in 2020. Registration offices (grey) are not comparable with examining offices. Singapore's 0 of 32 reflects missing grant data, not refusals.

07 · Partners

Only 41 families, 2.8%, have a co-applicant outside the group

62 of 1,450 families (4.3%) carry more than one applicant on the record. 41 families have at least one applicant outside the group, spread over 57 distinct names after normalisation, and 16 families are co-filed by two group entities. The 16 internal co-filings are not counted as collaboration. The strongest external link is Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, on 14 families, more than three times any other partner. With ICFO (4) and ICREA (3), the Barcelona research cluster holds most named academic co-filings; the group's Spanish entity B. Braun Surgical S.A. has 21 families. Industrial partners are few: Philips and Nanjing Nuoyuan Medical Devices with 3 each.

External co-applicants with 2 or more shared families

Co-applicantCountryTypeShared families
Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaESUniversity14
Fundació Institut de Ciències Fotòniques (ICFO)ESResearch4
Koninklijke Philips N.V.NLCompany3
Nanjing Nuoyuan Medical Devices Co., Ltd.CNCompany3
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)ESResearch3
Eberhard Karls Universität TübingenDEUniversity2
IHI Ionbond AGCHCompany2
Brunetti, BruceUSIndividual2
Co-applicant records in non-Latin script (not resolved)——5

Query 6 · 20.9 GBNames merged by normalising case, accents and punctuation (the Barcelona university appears under five spellings). 48 further organisations appear on one family each.

Self-inclusion check. Every group person record, and any name containing Braun, Aesculap, 贝朗, 蛇牌 or ブラウン, is removed from the partner side. No group entity appears in the table.

08 · Family size

288 families never leave a single office; 589 reach five or more

The 1,450 families contain 5,851 applications, including members filed by other applicants, against the 5,151 filed by the group: 4.04 members per family, median 4. The distribution has two peaks. 288 families (19.9%) stay at one office, the largest single bucket; a second concentration sits at five and six members, and 589 families (40.6%) reach five or more. Seven families reach 15 or more members. Family size is a rough proxy for what a company spends on an invention. A fifth of the portfolio staying at one filing fits the low German grant rate: a share of the DE priority filings is never taken further.

Patent families by number of applications in the family

Data table: family size
Family size distribution
Applications in the familyFamiliesShareCumulative share
128819.9%19.9%
222815.7%35.6%
316111.1%46.7%
418412.7%59.4%
520013.8%73.2%
619013.1%86.3%
71027.0%93.3%
8453.1%96.4%
9171.2%97.6%
1090.6%98.2%
1170.5%98.7%
1240.3%99.0%
1330.2%99.2%
1450.3%99.5%
15+70.5%100.0%
All families1,450100%—

Query 4 · 18.2 GBEvery application in the DOCDB family, including other applicants and filings outside 2014–2024

09 · Where it is moving

Surgical robots rose from 1 family to 20 while dialysis membranes declined

Growing fastest, in families a year: surgical robots (A61B 34/30), from 1 family in all of 2014–2018 to 20 in 2019–2022; bone drills (A61B 17/16), 3.2 to 13.3; knee and elbow prostheses (A61F 2/38), 2.0 to 10.0; pressure infusion pumps (A61M 5/142), 4.0 to 12.3. Shrinking: dialysis membranes (A61M 1/16), 17.6 to 12.0 (−32%); dialysis systems (A61M 1/14), 12.2 to 8.8 (−28%); blood treatment in a by-pass (A61M 1/36), 11.8 to 8.0 (−32%); guide needles (A61M 25/06), 9.6 to 6.0 (−38%). With G16H at 3.2 to 12.0 and manipulators (B25J) at 0.4 to 2.3, R&D weight shifts from fluid handling toward instrumented, navigated and software-supported surgery.

Families per year per IPC main group, 2014–2018 against 2019–2022

Data table: main groups by period
IPC main groups by period: families and families per year
IPC main groupDirectionTitle2014–2018per year2019–2022per year
A61B 34/30RisingSurgical robots10.2205.0
A61B 17/16RisingInstruments for osteoclasis; Drills163.25313.3
A61F 2/38RisingProstheses for elbows or knees102.04010.0
A61M 5/142RisingPressure infusion, e.g. using pumps204.04912.3
A61B 90/98RisingIdentification using electromagnetic means71.4307.5
A61F 2/46RisingSpecial tools for implanting artificial joints244.84110.3
A61M 5/145RisingInfusion using pressurised reservoirs81.6266.5
A61B 17/3201RisingSurgical scissors112.2256.3
A61B 17/15RisingGuides for surgical drills102.0235.8
A61B 90/90RisingIdentification means for patients or instruments112.2215.3
A61B 34/10RisingComputer-aided planning, simulation, modelling51.0174.3
A61B 17/94RisingEndoscopic surgical instruments30.6143.5
G16H 40/40RisingManagement of medical equipment or devices10.2133.3
A61M 1/16FallingBlood treatment with membranes8817.64812.0
A61M 1/14FallingDialysis systems; Artificial kidneys6112.2358.8
A61M 1/36FallingBlood treatment in a by-pass of the circulation5911.8328.0
A61M 25/06FallingBody-piercing guide needles489.6246.0
A61B 17/70FallingSpinal positioners or stabilisers377.4174.3
A61M 39/24FallingCheck- or non-return valves234.6123.0
A61B 17/88FallingMeans for implanting or extracting internal fixations224.471.8
A61M 1/34FallingFiltering material out of the blood224.4143.5
A61M 39/28FallingClamping means for flexible tubes142.861.5
A61B 50/30FallingContainers for packaging or sterilising instruments479.4348.5

Query 5 · 26.0 GB5 and 4 complete years; only per-year values compare. Groups with a base below 10 families get absolute counts, not growth rates. Rows are not additive.

10 · Inventors

Baden-Württemberg, Aesculap's home, ahead of Hessen

1,181 of 1,449 families with inventor data (81.5%) name at least one German inventor. Malaysia is second with 70 families, ahead of the United States (67), Switzerland (61) and France (46). Inside Germany the geocoded EP applications put Baden-Württemberg ahead of Hessen, 426 families against 325. Tuttlingen, Aesculap's site, is in Baden-Württemberg; the Melsungen headquarters is in Hessen. The regional split mirrors the entity split: the surgical business generates more families than the parent company.

Families with at least one inventor in the country

Data table: inventor countries
Inventor countries
CountryFamilies with an inventor thereShare of 1,449
DE — Germany1,18181.5%
MY — Malaysia704.8%
US — United States674.6%
CH — Switzerland614.2%
FR — France463.2%
ES — Spain261.8%
HU — Hungary201.4%
IT — Italy100.7%
PL — Poland90.6%
GB — United Kingdom80.6%
AT — Austria50.3%
IE — Ireland40.3%
SG, NL, CA, AU3 each0.2% each
(no country code on the inventor record)70848.9%

Query 6 · 20.9 GBCountry counts are lower bounds

Families by German federal state of the inventor, EP applications

Data table: German regions
German regions (NUTS-1, EP applications only)
NUTS-1Federal stateFamilies
DE1Baden-Württemberg426
DE7Hessen325
DE9Niedersachsen78
DE2Bayern34
DEDSachsen29
DEANordrhein-Westfalen28
DE3Berlin17
DEGThüringen12
DE4Brandenburg6
DEBRheinland-Pfalz4
DEFSchleswig-Holstein4
DE6Hamburg3

Query 6 · 20.9 GBStates with fewer than 3 families omitted. 5,652 distinct inventor records in the portfolio.

Coverage of the location data. 708 families contain at least one inventor record with no country code, so country counts are lower bounds. NUTS geocoding exists only for EP applications: 979 of the 1,070 EP applications (91.5%) carry a NUTS code at level 3 or 4; German national applications have none. A family with inventors in several countries or regions counts in each.

11 · How we counted

How the numbers were counted

  • One family, one countA DOCDB family is dated by the earliest filing year over all its members, including members before 2014 and members of other applicants, and only then filtered to 2014–2024. A family first filed in 2012 and extended in 2015 is outside the report. The yearly figures add up to 1,450.
  • The group, by filing nameThe scope is built on person_name in the applicant role: B. Braun names, Aesculap AG, and office-side renderings such as 贝朗, 蛇牌, ベー・ブラウン・メルズンゲン and ビー.ブラウン アビタム. Discovery searched Braun or Aesculap anywhere in the name and returned 145 name records with a family in the period, each reviewed.
  • Patents of inventionAll queries set ipr_type = 'PI'. Grant rates are per office on the 2014–2020 filing cohort; the PCT rate counts families with any WO member (737 of 1,450, 50.8%).
  • Every breakdown overlapsClasses and fields come from all symbols on all members; offices, entities (1,466 against 1,450) and inventor regions also sum above the total. No pie charts for that reason.
Checks and limits
  • Group boundary by filing nameCompanies acquired by B. Braun that kept filing under their previous name are not included: Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG (10 families) and Transcoject GmbH (4), 14 families or 0.97% of the portfolio, none of them already in scope. PATSTAT records no ownership link and no acquisition date. Filings as B. Braun Miethke GmbH are included (4 families).
  • Name-stem companies excludedBraun GmbH / Braun AG and De'Longhi Braun Household (Kronberg), Hartmann & Braun, The Braun Corporation, Braun Elevator, TricorBraun, Asea Braun Boveri, Brauns-Heitmann, the Braunkohle and Braunschweig name families, individual inventors named Braun, and Aesculapius Farmaceutici / Aesculapius Limited.
  • han_name cross-check, both directionsA han_name scope returns 1,447 families against 1,450: it adds 0 (no foreign organisation) and misses 3, the non-Latin renderings that carry themselves as their own han_name. The hazard here is grouping: Aesculap harmonises to AESCULAP AG.
  • Utility models and designs excluded136 utility-model-only and 55 design-only families, 191 in all, fall outside the report. A further 110 families in scope carry B. Braun utility-model applications alongside patent applications; those families are in, their utility-model members are not counted separately.
  • 2023 and 2024 are incompleteApplications are normally published 18 months after priority. Both years are shown and excluded from every trend statement.
  • National-phase timingPCT applications enter the national phase up to 30 months after priority, so national office counts for families first filed in 2021–2022 are lower bounds.
  • Small bases read as directionField and group changes on small bases are directional signals. Groups with fewer than 10 families in the first period are reported as counts, not growth rates.
  • Grant data coverageGrant rates use the 2014–2020 filing cohort because applications filed from 2021 are still in examination. Offices that register rather than examine (ES until the 2017 reform, PL, PT, DK, RU in this cohort) show rates at or near 100% and are not comparable with examining offices. Singapore shows 0 granted of 32 applications: missing grant information in the source, not refusals. Status comes from the granted flag; WO is excluded because the PCT does not grant.
  • Co-applicant countsThe 62, 41 and 16 families come from the nb_applicants flag, the applicant records and the entity grouping respectively, and are not additive. Co-applicant records in non-Latin script cannot be merged by the name normalisation; they are in the totals of 41 families and 57 organisations but not resolved to a name.
  • Inventor location is partial708 families contain an inventor record without a country code; NUTS data exist only for EP applications (979 of 1,070, 91.5%) and not for German national filings.
  • No classification-scope checks neededThe set comes from applicant names, not a code list, so subtree expansion, predecessor union and retired symbols do not apply. Classes only describe the set.
  • No external benchmarkAll comparisons are internal to the portfolio. No claim is made about B. Braun's position against other medical-technology companies.
  • EditionsRecomputed on 15 August 2026 against PATSTAT Spring 2026 (patstat-mtc.patstat_2026a); labels from IPC 20260101 and CPC 202608.

The core scope: KPIs, han_name cross-check, annual trend and entity split

Query 3 · 17.9 GBqueries.sql · 8 queries · 15.9–26.0 GB each

Release protocol

  1. Agentsearch + draftBuilds the name scope and queries PATSTAT read-only. Every number comes from SQL.
  2. Checks13 rulesEvery claim must trace back to a query; chart and table must agree.
  3. Reviewsubject expertChecks scope, counts and wording before publication.
  4. Approvalsecond personA second person not involved in the report approves publication.

Next step

Which company should we profile for you?

A report like this one starts at 1,500 € plus VAT. Or learn to build it yourself on the EPO's Technology Intelligence Platform.

Book a scoping call · Training for PATLIB centres