Company profile · Airbus SE · 2014–2024

Airbus starts fewer patent families a year than in 2014, and files more of them at the EPO.

8,608 DOCDB patent families and 22,064 applications across 35 patent offices. Families with an EP application rose from 52.9% to 67.4% between the 2014–2018 and 2019–2022 cohorts.

Data
EPO PATSTAT Global, Spring 2026 (patstat_2026a)
Unit
DOCDB family, by earliest Airbus application
Scope
Airbus-branded applicant names · patents of invention
Queries
10, all published
Families per year by filing entity group (non-exclusive) · rows: commercial aircraft, defence and space, group and holding, helicoptersQuery 2
  1. −4.0%

    a year: the compound change in new families from 2014 (957) to 2022 (691).

    Filing trend
  2. 67.4%

    of the families first filed 2019–2022 carry an EP application, against 52.9% of the 2014–2018 cohort.

    Offices
  3. 4.2%

    of the 2019–2022 cohort carries hydrogen or fuel-cell codes, up from 1.1%.

    Themes
  4. 304

    families (3.5%) name a co-applicant from outside the Airbus group.

    Partners
  5. 30

    families name an inventor in China, the fourth largest filing office with 2,743 families.

    Inventors

01 · Filing trend

Airbus starts fewer new families a year than in 2014

2014–2016

Roughly 960 new families a year: 957, 961 and 970.

2017–2019

779 and 780 in 2017 and 2018, then 885 in 2019.

2020–2022

Between 612 and 691 a year. Over complete filing years, 2014 (957) to 2022 (691), the compound annual change is −4.0%.

Read with care

2023 and 2024 are provisional: applications publish about 18 months after filing. The 2024 application count is a lower bound. No growth statement in this report ends in either year.

New patent families by year of first Airbus application

Data table: filing trend 2014–2024
New families by year of first Airbus filing, and applications filed that year (* provisional)
YearNew patent familiesApplications filed that year
20149572,680
20159612,598
20169702,196
20177792,098
20187802,355
20198852,248
20206121,666
20216471,771
20226911,915
2023*7361,757
2024*590780
Total8,60822,064

Query 2Each family counts once, in the year of its earliest Airbus application. Applications are counted in the year they were filed.

02 · Filing entities

Defence and space names file less, group names file more

Commercial aircraft

Commercial-aircraft entities carry 5,740 of 8,608 families and stay between 387 and 657 a year.

Defence and space

Families under defence-and-space entity names fall from 219 (2014) to 40 (2024).

Group and holding

Families under plain group or holding names rise from 79 (2020) to 147 (2021) and stay at 89 or more. Both series move in opposite directions in the same years, which is what a reassignment of the filing entity would look like.

What is filed

Helicopter entities fall from 115 to 29. The subject matter moves more gently: B64G (cosmonautics) goes from 3.9% of the 2014–2018 cohort to 2.9% of the 2019–2022 cohort.

Patent families per year by filing entity group

Data table: families by filing entity group
Patent families per year by filing entity group (* provisional)
YearCommercial aircraftDefence and spaceGroup and holdingHelicopters
201458921998115
201555825086115
201659222794100
201747414989107
20185501087089
20196571159876
2020387877991
20214299014770
20224909314160
2023*5476612547
2024*467408929
Total5,7401,4441,116899

Query 2Grouped from han_name; the groups sum to 9,199 assignments against 8,608 families

This measures the applicant on the paperwork, not where the work is done. A family filed jointly by two group companies counts in both groups. Movements between groups can reflect a change in which legal entity signs the filing as much as a change in activity. Read the entity series as a record of who files, and B64G as the record of what is filed.

Largest single applicant names (harmonised), patent families

  1. 01AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH2,394
  2. 02AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS2,094
  3. 03AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD1,026
  4. 04AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE GMBH701
  5. 05AIRBUS SAS669
  6. 06AIRBUS HELICOPTERS637
  7. 07AIRBUS OPERATIONS LIMITED303
  8. 08AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE SAS300
  9. 09AIRBUS OPERATIONS SL281
  10. 10AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH272
  11. 11AIRBUS254
  12. 12AIRBUS OPERATIONS SLU212
  13. 13AIRBUS FRANCE155
  14. 14AIRBUS OPERATIONS, S.L.151
  15. 15AIRBUS SAFRAN LAUNCHERS SAS137

Query 2PATSTAT harmonisation is incomplete: LTD and LIMITED, SL and S.L. remain separate. Counts are non-exclusive.

03 · Offices

The EP route rose from 52.9% to 67.4% of families

The US office has 5,481 families and the EPO 5,075 (59.0%). 927 families (10.8%) carry a PCT application, and 5,909 of 8,608 (68.6%) are filed at more than one office. Between the 2014–2018 and 2019–2022 cohorts the EP share rises by 14.5 percentage points, against the maturity bias. The German office falls from 21.9% to 13.5%; China rises from 31.1% to 35.6% and is the fourth most used office, with 2,743 families.

Families by filing office, 2014–2024

Data table: families by filing office
Families by filing office, 2014–2024
OfficePatent familiesApplicationsShare of 8,608 families
US — United States5,4815,67863.7%
EP — European Patent Office5,0755,25759.0%
FR — France3,0423,05635.3%
CN — China2,7432,78331.9%
DE — Germany1,4041,40916.3%
GB — United Kingdom1,1861,20313.8%
WO — PCT92794010.8%
CA — Canada5065135.9%
ES — Spain5065125.9%
KR — Korea2172232.5%
JP — Japan1531581.8%
PL — Poland83831.0%
AU — Australia65660.8%
BR — Brazil48490.6%
RU — Russia35350.4%

Query 2A family counts at every office where it has a member

Share of cohort families filed at each office (%)

Data table: office share by cohort
Office share by first-filing cohort
OfficeFamilies 2014–2018Share of 4,447Families 2019–2022Share of 2,835
US3,02668.0%1,88066.3%
EP2,35152.9%1,91067.4%
FR1,68838.0%97734.5%
CN1,38231.1%1,00835.6%
DE97421.9%38313.5%
GB52111.7%44515.7%
WO47210.6%40114.1%
ES3207.2%1756.2%
CA3467.8%1425.0%
KR1383.1%562.0%

Query 2Cohorts of 4,447 and 2,835 families; both stop at 2022

Cohort maturity affects the cohort chart. A family first filed in 2014 has had about twelve years to add foreign members; one first filed in 2022 has had about four, and national or regional entry from a PCT application typically happens at around 30 months. The 2019–2022 cohort is under-counted at every downstream office. Shares that rise against that bias (EP, CN, GB, WO) are the robust readings. DE is largely a first-filing office, so its share is barely truncated. The US figure of 66.3% for the later cohort is a lower bound and should not be read as a decline.

04 · Technology

Two aircraft subclasses carry the portfolio

B64D (equipment fitted in or to aircraft) appears on 3,276 families (38.1%) and B64C (aeroplanes; helicopters) on 3,148 (36.6%). Ground and deck installations (B64F) follow at 962. Below that the profile is that of an aerospace supplier: plastics shaping (B29C, 773), digital data processing (G06F, 464), gas-turbine plants (F02C, 441) and fastening elements (F16B, 391). In the WIPO 35-field view, Transport covers 5,769 families (67.0%) and Mechanical elements 1,267 (14.7%).

Most frequent IPC subclasses, patent families (non-exclusive)

Data table: IPC subclasses
IPC subclasses in the Airbus portfolio
IPC subclassTitleFamiliesShare of 8,6082014–2018 cohort2019–2022 cohort
B64DEquipment for fitting in or to aircraft; flight suits; parachutes3,27638.1%1,6251,133
B64CAeroplanes; helicopters3,14836.6%1,6481,100
B64FGround or aircraft-carrier-deck installations96211.2%452371
B29CShaping or joining of plastics7739.0%470225
G06FElectric digital data processing4645.4%283120
F02CGas-turbine plants; air intakes for jet-propulsion plants4415.1%193163
F16BDevices for fastening or securing constructional elements3914.5%204129
B32BLayered products3654.2%235100
G05DSystems for controlling or regulating non-electric variables3604.2%208110
G08GTraffic control systems3293.8%19395
G01CMeasuring distances, levels or bearings; surveying; navigation2813.3%17883
B64GCosmonautics; vehicles or equipment therefor2813.3%17481
F02KJet-propulsion plants2803.3%16491
H04LTransmission of digital information2703.1%15391
F16LPipes; joints or fittings for pipes2593.0%11584
B29LIndexing scheme relating to particular articles (plastics)2472.9%14485
G01SRadio direction-finding; radio navigation; radar2372.8%13772
H04BTransmission2262.6%11880
G01NInvestigating or analysing materials2172.5%14355
H01MBatteries and processes for direct conversion of chemical into electrical energy2142.5%6994
G01MTesting static or dynamic balance of machines or structures1982.3%9273
F01DNon-positive-displacement machines or engines1782.1%10255

Query 3IPC symbols aggregated across all family members

WIPO technology fields, patent families (non-exclusive)

Data table: WIPO technology fields
WIPO 35 technology fields
Technology fieldFamiliesShare of 8,6082014–2018 cohort2019–2022 cohort
Transport5,76967.0%2,9162,005
Mechanical elements1,26714.7%639418
Measurement1,14813.3%662351
Other special machines91610.6%554271
Control8099.4%448258
Engines, pumps, turbines7979.3%419267
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy7739.0%360268
Computer technology6817.9%367220
Surface technology, coating4885.7%295151
Machine tools4254.9%248131
Telecommunications3814.4%203143
Digital communication3504.1%199119

Query 3A family counts in every field it carries

05 · Technology shift

H01M doubled its share while plastics and layered products lost ground

The airframe core holds: B64D moves from 36.5% to 40.0% of cohort families and B64F from 10.2% to 13.1%. Plastics shaping (B29C) falls from 10.6% to 7.9%, layered products (B32B) from 5.3% to 3.5% and materials investigation (G01N) from 3.2% to 1.9%. H01M doubles its share from 1.6% to 3.3%, on 69 and 94 families. Gas-turbine plants (F02C) rise from 4.3% to 5.7%.

Share of cohort families carrying each IPC subclass (%)

Data table: subclass share by cohort
IPC subclass share by filing cohort
IPC subclassFamilies 2014–2018Share of 4,447Families 2019–2022Share of 2,835Change (percentage points)
B64D Equipment fitted in or to aircraft1,62536.5%1,13340.0%+3.5
B64C Aeroplanes; helicopters1,64837.1%1,10038.8%+1.7
B64F Ground or deck installations45210.2%37113.1%+2.9
B29C Shaping or joining of plastics47010.6%2257.9%−2.7
G06F Electric digital data processing2836.4%1204.2%−2.2
F02C Gas-turbine plants1934.3%1635.7%+1.4
B32B Layered products2355.3%1003.5%−1.8
H01M Batteries; direct conversion of chemical into electrical energy691.6%943.3%+1.7
G01N Investigating or analysing materials1433.2%551.9%−1.3
B64G Cosmonautics1743.9%812.9%−1.0

Query 3H01M and G01N rest on fewer than 150 families per cohort: read them as direction, not magnitude

06 · Themes

Hydrogen and fuel-cell families rose from 1.1% to 4.2% of the cohort

Families with an aircraft power-plant installation code (B64D 27) move from 5.9% to 10.4%: 263 against 294 families, on a cohort that is itself 36% smaller. Hydrogen and fuel-cell codes (H01M 8, C01B 3, F17C) move from 49 to 119 families. Learning-model computing (G06N) goes from 16 to 40 families, 0.4% to 1.4%.

Share of cohort families carrying each theme (%)

Data table: themed areas by cohort
Themed technology areas by filing cohort
Theme (codes matched)Families 2014–20242014–2018 cohortShare of 4,4472019–2022 cohortShare of 2,835
Aircraft power-plant installation (B64D 27)6822635.9%29410.4%
Hydrogen and fuel cells (H01M 8, C01B 3, F17C)265491.1%1194.2%
Electrical power supply and conversion (H02J, H02K, H02M, H02P)218952.1%762.7%
Additive manufacturing (B33Y, B22F 10)2141302.9%692.4%
Unmanned aircraft (B64U and B64C 39/02)1861162.6%632.2%
Batteries and electric storage (H01M 4, H01M 10, H01M 50)92441.0%341.2%
AI and machine learning (G06N)79160.4%401.4%
Climate-change mitigation, aeronautics (Y02T 50)1,096————

Query 5IPC and CPC matched together. Themes overlap; the smallest rest on fewer than 50 families per cohort.

Two data-quality notes. 1,096 families carry a Y02T 50 tag (climate-change mitigation in aeronautics); Y tags are a secondary, CPC-only scheme with incomplete coverage of recent years, so only the total is reported. The unmanned-aircraft theme unions B64U, introduced in 2023, with its predecessor B64C 39/02.

07 · Grants

81.0% of US applications filed 2014–2019 are granted, 24.9% of German ones

Among offices that examine substantively, the cohort reaches 81.0% at the USPTO (2,600 of 3,210 applications), 82.6% at the French office (1,665 of 2,016) and 76.3% at the EPO (2,027 of 2,658). China sits at 59.3% (875 of 1,475), Japan at 64.2% and Canada at 54.3%. These are individual applications, not families: a family granted in one office and refused in another counts in both.

Grant rate of applications filed 2014–2019, as of Spring 2026 (%)

Data table: grant rate by office
Grant rate by office, applications filed 2014–2019
OfficeApplications filed 2014–2019GrantedGrant rate
US — United States3,2102,60081.0%
EP — European Patent Office2,6582,02776.3%
FR — France2,0161,66582.6%
CN — China1,47587559.3%
DE — Germany1,16529024.9%
GB — United Kingdom68210515.4%
ES — Spain37737599.5%
CA — Canada35919554.3%
KR — Korea14611478.1%
JP — Japan1207764.2%

Query 2Offices with at least 100 applications in the cohort. A pending application counts as not granted.

A grant rate here is an outcome count, not a quality score. The spread from 15.4% to 99.5% reflects office procedure as much as the inventions. The priority-filing route may explain DE and GB; this report cannot confirm it. WO is excluded: its 7 recorded grants out of 509 applications would read as a 1.4% rate.

08 · Partners

Only 304 families, 3.5%, name a partner from outside the group

1,164 families (13.5%) carry at least one application with more than one applicant. Of these, 860 carry no applicant this report counts as external. Among external partners, public research leads: CNES (23 families), CNRS (19), Fraunhofer (15) and DLR (14). The PATSTAT sector field marks 92 of the 304 families as government or non-profit and 42 as university.

External co-applicants by shared patent families

Data table: external co-applicants
External co-applicants with at least 5 shared families
Co-applicant (harmonised name)PATSTAT sectorShared families2014–2018 cohort2019–2022 cohort
Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES)Gov / non-profit23137
ArianeGroup SASCompany20182
CNRSGov / non-profit19161
Fraunhofer-GesellschaftGov / non-profit1576
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR)Gov / non-profit1484
C Series Aircraft Limited PartnershipCompany1082
Bombardier Inc.Company990
Short Brothers PLCCompany990
STELIA AerospaceUnknown936
CEA (Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives)Unknown624
Vibro-Meter SACompany603
Liebherr-Aerospace Lindenberg GmbHCompany642
ArianeGroup GmbHCompany550
Hydac Technology GmbHCompany550
University of SurreyUniversity541
The Manufacturing Technology Centre LtdUnknown501
Manufacturing Technology Center LimitedUnknown501

Query 4Matched on the application, with every Airbus name variant, Latin and non-Latin, excluded from the partner side

Families with an external co-applicant, by the partner's PATSTAT sector

PATSTAT sector of the co-applicantFamilies
Company145
Government / non-profit92
Unknown78
University42
Individual13
Government / non-profit and university2
Not set4
Distinct families with an external co-applicant304

Query 4Sector rows sum to 376 against 304 families: a family with partners in two sectors counts in both

Partner names are PATSTAT's harmonised names, shown as recorded: The Manufacturing Technology Centre Ltd and Manufacturing Technology Center Limited are the same organisation recorded twice. ArianeGroup and STELIA Aerospace appear as external partners because the report scopes Airbus by the name on the application, not by ownership. The same joint venture sits on both sides of that boundary: filings under ArianeGroup are external, filings under its pre-2017 name Airbus Safran Launchers SAS are in scope, with 137 families.

09 · Inventors

Inventors sit in the group's four home countries

France appears on 3,626 families (42.1%) and Germany on 3,428 (39.8%), followed by the United Kingdom with 1,164 (13.5%) and Spain with 567 (6.6%). The rest is a long tail: the United States on 91 families, India on 56, Canada on 42, China on 30. China is the fourth most used filing office, with 2,743 families, and the eighth inventor country in the table, with 30. The pattern is consistent with filing for market coverage rather than for locally generated inventions.

Families with at least one inventor in the country (non-exclusive)

Data table: inventor countries
Families by inventor country of record
CountryFamilies with an inventor thereShare of 8,608
FR — France3,62642.1%
DE — Germany3,42839.8%
GB — United Kingdom1,16413.5%
ES — Spain5676.6%
US — United States911.1%
IN — India560.7%
CA — Canada420.5%
CN — China300.3%
NL — Netherlands220.3%
IT — Italy150.2%
CH — Switzerland120.1%
AT — Austria120.1%

Query 4The twelve rows sum to 9,065 against 8,608 families. Country of record, not workplace.

10 · How we counted

How the numbers were counted

  • One family, one countA DOCDB family counts once, in the year of its earliest Airbus application, taken over all Airbus filings of the family. 8,608 families start in 2014–2024; the annual series sums exactly to that total. Applications (22,064) are counted in the year they were filed.
  • The name as filedPATSTAT holds no company identifier. The scope is built on person_name with an Airbus-group brand: AIRBUS, EUROCOPTER, ASTRIUM, CASSIDIAN, EADS followed by a corporate word, European Aeronautic Defence and Space, and the non-Latin forms 空中客车 / 空中客車 / 空中巴士 / 空客, エアバス, 에어버스. The harmonised han_name is a cross-check only.
  • Applicants, patents of inventionOnly the applicant role counts (applt_seq_nr > 0) and only ipr_type = 'PI'. The inventor role is used only for inventor locations.
  • Every breakdown overlapsSubclasses, fields, offices, filing entities (9,199), inventor countries (9,065) and partner sectors (376 against 304) sum above the family total. No pie charts for that reason.
Checks and limits
  • Family counts are a lower boundName harmonisation is never complete; Airbus filings under a name without a group brand are not reachable by this profile.
  • han_name imports strangersThe harmonised name AIRBUS UK LTD is attached to person records reading AlliedSignal Ltd., AlliedSignal Limited, Allied Signal Limited and Honeywell UK Ltd., Bristol. In the other direction han_name recovers Dutch Space B.V. and PlantCML, Inc. as genuine members: 2 families, none unique to that route. Within the fixed scope han_name is used only to group filing entities.
  • Non-Latin spellings searched separatelyChinese, Japanese and Korean applicant records are not harmonised onto a Latin han_name. 352 families carry an original-script Airbus record; 11 of them carry no Latin-script Airbus record. Without them, Airbus itself would surface as an external co-applicant.
  • Persons named Eads excludedA bare EADS token matches a further 251 person records in a blank or unknown sector, and the sampled names are natural persons. psn_sector = INDIVIDUAL marks only 13 records in the whole match set, so the pattern requires a corporate word after the token. The discovery pass returned 3,148 person records before this review.
  • Design rights and utility models excludedThe ipr_type filter leaves out 127 utility-model and 40 design families with an Airbus applicant in the window.
  • Separately branded subsidiaries outside the scopeMeasured in families the report does not contain: Premium AEROTEC 66, STELIA Aerospace 50, Aerolia 11, APWorks 7, Sogerma 1. 135 families in total, about 1.6% of the portfolio size.
  • Joint ventures without an Airbus brand outside the scopeArianeGroup contributes 357 and MBDA 416 families whose applicants carry no Airbus-branded name. Airbus is one of several owners of both; counting those 773 families would credit the group with portfolios it does not hold alone. A joint venture filing under an Airbus-branded name is in scope: Airbus Safran Launchers SAS (137 families) and Airbus OneWeb Satellites SAS.
  • Recent years are provisionalApplications publish about 18 months after filing, so 2023 and 2024 will rise. No growth rate ends in either year and no period boundary sits inside them; the cohorts stop at 2022.
  • Later cohorts are less matureA family first filed in 2022 has had less time to acquire foreign members than one from 2014, which depresses downstream office shares in the 2019–2022 cohort. Rises against that bias are robust; falls at offices entered late are not necessarily real.
  • Small classes read as directionH01M and G01N rest on fewer than 150 families per cohort; the smallest themes on fewer than 50.
  • Code-defined themesThe patent set is defined by names, so the IPC and WIPO breakdowns need no code-set completion. The themes do: prefix matching is subtree-closed (H01M 8 captures every group beneath it); B64U is unioned with its predecessor B64C 39/02; no is_active filter, so retired symbols are kept. IPC and CPC are matched together. Y02T 50 is CPC-only and reported as a total.
  • Grant rates are outcome countsNot a quality score: they vary with each office's procedure. One possible explanation for DE (24.9%) and GB (15.4%) is the priority-filing route, in which a national application secures a filing date and lapses once an EP or PCT continuation is on file; the report does not measure why applications end. WO is never granted and is excluded.
  • Grant status is a snapshotA pending application counts as not granted. Grant rates use the 2014–2019 filing cohort for that reason and still carry a residual pendency effect. Applications filed from 2020 are still largely pending.
  • RatesPCT rate = families with at least one WO member ÷ all families (927 ÷ 8,608). Grant rate = granted applications ÷ applications, per office, 2014–2019 cohort. Co-application rate = families with a co-applicant ÷ all families.
  • External validation is limitedA timeboxed public-source search found no per-year family count for Airbus comparable with this definition. The plausibility check rests on internal consistency: the annual series sums to the total, and office and technology sub-totals behave as expected for a non-exclusive breakdown.
  • Inventor countries are addresses of recordNot workplaces, and not populated for every inventor; families whose inventors carry no country are absent.
  • EditionsCompiled on 15 August 2026 against PATSTAT Spring 2026 (patstat-mtc.patstat_2026a), classification labels from IPC 20260101 and CPC 202608. Re-running queries.sql against a later edition will not reproduce the numbers exactly.

The canonical scope, KPIs, annual series, offices, grants and filing entities

Query 2queries.sql · 10 queries · each carries the full scope CTE

Release protocol

  1. Agentsearch + draftBuilds the name scope and queries PATSTAT read-only. Every number comes from SQL.
  2. Checks13 rulesEvery claim must trace back to a query; chart and table must agree.
  3. Reviewsubject expertChecks scope, counts and wording before publication.
  4. Approvalsecond personA second person not involved in the report approves publication.

Next step

Which company should we profile for you?

A report like this one starts at 1,500 € plus VAT. Or learn to build it yourself on the EPO's Technology Intelligence Platform.

Book a scoping call · Training for PATLIB centres